
39 Management's report ⋅ Corporate governance Contents
GN Store Nord A/S
CV, as well as a thorough description of the candidate’s quali-
fications, will be available to the shareholders.
GN is a global company and to successfully develop and
maintain this position in the marketplace, GN is dependent
upon global expertise and experience. The Board of Directors
is a diverse group in terms of global experience, functional
competencies, and industry background, which ensures that it
can fulfill its obligations. Board members possess expertise
within med-tech, innovation, product development,
digitalization, online marketing, and commercialization, as
well as thorough understanding of financial and human
resource matters and in-depth knowledge of GN’s business.
The composition of the Board of Directors is a mix of mem-
bers with executive positions and professional board mem-
bers of both genders and diverse nationalities. This composi-
tion is deemed to provide a good balance between
knowledge, competencies, experience, and availability for a
substantial workload.
Evaluation of the performance of the Executive Manage-
ment Team and the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors assesses the work and results of the
Executive Management on an ongoing basis as an integrated
and natural part of their regular meetings. In the beginning of
every year, the Board establishes performance plans with spe-
cific KPIs for each member of the Executive Management.
The Board assesses the performance of the Executive Man-
agement and its execution of the agreed KPIs on an ongoing
basis during the year and formally at the end of the year. The
Board also evaluates on an ongoing basis the structure and
composition of the Executive Management in light of compe-
tencies and execution of the company’s strategy. At the year-
end assessment of Executive Management, the Chairman of
the Board is having individual performance evaluation meet-
ings with each member of the Executive Management. In ad-
dition, the work of the Executive Management is also as-
sessed as an integrated part of the Board’s own annual self-
evaluation, ensuring that the Executive Management’s work is
evaluated in accordance with pre-defined criteria.
The Board of Directors has – since 2009 - conducted an an-
nual self-evaluation of its work through which the Board can
track its own performance, strengths and development areas
over time and consequently the Board has been able to con-
tinuously improve its work and procedures. Progress has been
measured from one year to the other. The overall purpose of
the Board’s self-evaluation process continues to be to secure
a high level of professionalism, solid corporate governance
and contribution to the continued success of the company.
Furthermore, it ensures that the Board continues to have the
right composition and expertise at the Board.
The annual self-evaluation process covers the contributions
of each individual Board member as well as the achievements
of the Board as a whole and of the Board committees. The
self-evaluation process secures a structured and systematic
approach for the assessment of the Board’s work and is led by
the Chairman of the Board. The process also includes an as-
sessment of other management positions that each Board
and Executive member holds and assesses potential over-
boarding issues. The company subscribes to the concept of
“non- overboarding” and, therefore, carefully considers the
workload and other requirements such other management
positions may impose on each individual Board or Executive
member.
The self-evaluation survey is anonymous and is based on a
comprehensive questionnaire that among other covers the
following evaluation criteria in accordance with the Good Cor-
porate Governance recommendations and is managed by the
office of the General Counsel:
• The Board’s contribution and results,
• The Board’s cooperation with the Executive Management
Team,
• The Chairman’s leadership of the Board,
• The composition of the Board (including competencies, di-
versity, and the number of members),
• The work in the Board committees and the committees’
structure, and
• The organization and quality of the Board materials
Each year, the questions in the survey questionnaire are being
reviewed by the Chairman of the Board to ensure, that they
are all applicable and relevant, taking into consideration any
topics of importance for the Board’s work during that year. In
2020, the Board Survey was conducted in December and in-
cluded added sections on both the Board’s and the Executive
Management Team’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic,
both in terms of global impact on the business short term and
long term and impact on the global workforce.
Each question in the self-evaluation questionnaire is answered
by each Board members and each member of the Executive
Management Team and is rated with a score from 1 to 5. The
questionnaire also offers the participants the option to pro-
vide additional commentary input, all on an anonymous basis.
The Chairman also has individual meetings with each Board
member and member of the Executive Management Team to
follow up on the results of the survey. The results are pre-
sented in a Board meeting by the Chairman combined with a
Board discussion of the results
The Chairman of the Board is furthermore responsible for
providing an update to the Annual General Meeting on the
general results of the self-evaluation.
Over time it is the Board’s intention to obtain periodic exter-
nal assistance to the Board evaluation process. The Board had
planned to do so in 2020. However, due to a new composition
of the Board with three new external members joining in
March 2020, and the extraordinary circumstances resulting