Boussard & Gavaudan Holding Limited
Directors’ Report
For the year ended 31 December 2021
22
consequences, the fact that the operating expenses (excluding performance fees) of BGHL represent less than 2%
of its NAV on an annual basis makes this risk remote.
The Board has conducted a robust assessment of the principal and emerging risks and uncertainties facing BGHL,
and also assesses long term viability. The ongoing impact of COVID-19 pandemic has formed part of this
assessment. The key risk to BGHL has been identified as a failure of the investment decision making process to
generate NAV accretion that is in line with investor expectations, and which is attractive on a risk adjusted basis
when compared with alternative managed investment opportunities.
BGHL’s performance is measured on a monthly basis via both the NAV of its underlying investments and its share
price. Key data inputs used by the Investment Manager when making investment decisions in the Master Fund
(BGHL’s principal investment) comprise company earnings (quarterly), macro factors (daily interest and currency
exchange rates) and indicators of sentiment (yield curves and risk measures, such as the VIX index). Scenario
stress tests are run on a monthly basis to measure potential “drawdowns” (i.e. reductions in NAV on a monthly
basis) on the portfolio in the event of changes in the economic climate. These stress tests comprise severe but
plausible scenarios and have been an integral part of the portfolio construction process for many years.
BGHL’s performance is compared primarily to peer group funds on an annual basis, and performance fees payable
to the Investment Manager are also calculated annually. The significant majority of investment positions taken by
the Master Fund are in liquid assets that can be converted to cash readily in the market and great effort is made by
the Investment Manager to minimise drawdowns and to maintain liquidity. This emphasis on short term position
management is an important feature of the Master Fund’s strategy. Given that BGHL’s operating costs as a
percentage of its realisable investment portfolio are low, and that it is a closed ended fund, the Directors consider
there to be significant liquidity headroom available in all but the most extreme market failure scenarios.
Despite the emphasis on short term performance and resilience described above, not all investment positions are
entered into with the expectation of them being unwound within twelve months. Moreover, the “repeatability” of
the investment process is of fundamental importance. The Investment Manager has developed proprietary
analytical tools and processes that it seeks to apply on a consistent basis over time when making investment
decisions. In this way it seeks to generate positive risk adjusted returns using proprietary strategies that are
sustainable for the medium to long term, such that performance is not predicated on the retention of “key persons”.
Such algorithms and tools are necessarily a function of market behaviour and asset pricing correlations, and hence
subject to change over time.
Whilst the turnover of positions within the Master Fund is thus relatively short term in duration, the timeframe
over which it is necessary to identify and respond to “paradigm shifts” in economic markets is longer term in
nature. Factors such as government or central bank policies (e.g. quantitative easing) or external events (including
wars and regional instability) can cause significant changes in investor sentiment, which can in turn alter market
assessments of intrinsic value and correlations between different asset types. For these reasons, the Board considers
a three-year time horizon to 30 April 2025 as being the appropriate period over which to assess future prospects
and viability.
The Board has made a commitment that, if the Company’s shares trade at an average discount in excess of 15 per
cent over the financial year to 31 December 2022, the Board will propose a continuation vote (the “continuation
vote”) in 2023. The Board will invite the Concert Party to consider whether it will commit to abstain from voting
on the continuation Vote and, if applicable, on any subsequent vote to liquidate the Company. Previously the
Concert Party has declined to make any voting commitment in advance. Without their support, the Company will
not have the shareholder support necessary to pass a special resolution to liquidate the Company.
On the basis of the relevant and rigorous assessment described above, the Board believes that BGHL will remain
viable as a closed-ended investment company for at least the period ending 30 April 2025, whilst also remaining
conscious that a continuation vote will be put to shareholders in 2023 following the AGM if the average discount
then prevailing is greater than 15%.
Going Concern
The Board conducts a rigorous and proportionate assessment of BGHL’s operational and financial risks with
reference to cash flow requirements, and the liquidity of investments on a quarterly basis. BGHL incurs ongoing
fees and expenses associated with its day to day operations, provides cash collateral under currency hedging
transactions and uses cash to repurchase its own shares.
The Directors regularly consider the financial solvency of BGHL and are required by the Companies Law to do
so on every occasion that any distribution is to be declared, including, but not limited to, the redemption and
conversion of shares, and repurchases by BGHL of its own shares. This is evidenced by a formal solvency
statement. The Directors are confident that BGHL’s assets exceed its liabilities and that BGHL has sufficient liquid
assets to meet its liabilities as they fall due. Substantially all of the net assets of BGHL are currently invested in
BGF shares. BGF shareholders have a monthly redemption right with 60 calendar day prior notice.